🚚 Free shipping in BC over $40 · Rest of Canada over $55
Case No. 001
The People vs. The Spread Aisle

The chocolate was never the problem.

The evidence ↓

The sugar was.

A jar of chocolate spread is more than half sugar. They took something that only needed cocoa and peanuts, poured in a sugar bomb, slicked it with palm oil, and sold it back to you at a markup. They turned it into spreadable candy. The chocolate took the blame. The sugar walked.

What they did to it
CHOCOLATE
+ 57% SUGAR + PALM OIL + BARELY ANY COCOA + ARTIFICIAL FLAVOR + A GUILT TRIP + A MARKUP
We just took it all back out. Just chocolate and peanuts. The way it started.
Keep scrolling
The charges

Three counts. All guilty.

You're the jury. Examine each exhibit — then hand down the verdict.
Guilty
I
Count I — Fraud

Sold you a jar of sugar and called it chocolate.

Barely any cocoa. They put hazelnuts on the label and a sugar bomb in the jar, then called it a chocolate spread. We checked the math.

57%
of the jar is sugar
🔒 Examine the evidence
Exhibit A · sealed
Guilty
II
Count II — Assault

Slicked it with palm oil to save a buck.

Cheap fat for texture and shelf life — second ingredient by weight. We use zero. You can make it creamy with actual peanuts and cocoa instead.

#2
ingredient: palm oil
🔒 Examine the evidence
Exhibit B · sealed
Guilty
III
Count III — Identity theft

Pumped peanut butter full of filler and charged you more.

Pea protein and oils bolted onto something already full of protein. Peanuts bring 7g on their own. No filler — and no markup for the privilege.

7g
protein, no filler
🔒 Examine the evidence
Exhibit C · sealed
The verdict Sealed 0 / 3
Convict all three to read the verdict.
The verdict — and the only rule we follow

Make the good version.
Leave out the nonsense.
Shut up about it.

MyFitness. The defense rests.

Enough talk. Go try the good version.

Shop the honest one →